Talk:India Sioux: Difference between revisions
From Luchawiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'm opposed to adding "yet-to-debut" relatives. Why don't we wait till they actually start working regularly? I mean, Super Comando says he has 12 brothers, 2 of which we know are wrestling so would we also add "10 yet-to-debut brothers"? Or would we add Billy Boy Jr. even though he's not even a year old yet?--[[User:Robert|Robert]] 16:08, 9 August 2006 (CDT) | I'm opposed to adding "yet-to-debut" relatives. Why don't we wait till they actually start working regularly? I mean, Super Comando says he has 12 brothers, 2 of which we know are wrestling so would we also add "10 yet-to-debut brothers"? Or would we add Billy Boy Jr. even though he's not even a year old yet?--[[User:Robert|Robert]] 16:08, 9 August 2006 (CDT) | ||
In this case, I put it there becuase she specfically said she had a brother that was about to start wrestling. But since it's not immediatly obvious that he actually did or who he is, I'd be fine with pulling it. --[[User:Nkhan|thecubsfan]] 16:23, 9 August 2006 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 16:23, 9 August 2006
I'm opposed to adding "yet-to-debut" relatives. Why don't we wait till they actually start working regularly? I mean, Super Comando says he has 12 brothers, 2 of which we know are wrestling so would we also add "10 yet-to-debut brothers"? Or would we add Billy Boy Jr. even though he's not even a year old yet?--Robert 16:08, 9 August 2006 (CDT)
In this case, I put it there becuase she specfically said she had a brother that was about to start wrestling. But since it's not immediatly obvious that he actually did or who he is, I'd be fine with pulling it. --thecubsfan 16:23, 9 August 2006 (CDT)
